How I work

Small, focused work with a clear deliverable. Fast, fixed price, no sales cycle — you tell me what you need, I confirm scope by email, and we go.

This is the right fit when you want senior eyes now: a review before you ship, a sanity check on an approach, a hard bug that’s eaten a day, or a quick call to talk through a decision before you commit to it. Everything is done remotely over Zoom and email — no meetings you don’t need.

If it grows into something bigger, we’ll talk about a full project. But plenty of the most useful work is exactly this size.

End-to-end product or feature builds. I scope, design, build, and ship — and I leave your team able to maintain what I deliver.

This is the work where you have a real problem and want it solved properly: an AI-native MVP, a RAG system that retrieves the right thing, an agentic workflow that does real work, a cross-platform app from one codebase, or AI features added to software that already has users you can’t afford to break.

Fixed price with milestone payments, or a weekly retainer if the scope genuinely needs to flex. Everything runs remotely over Zoom and email — clear deliverables, a clear timeline, and a handoff that leaves your team able to extend it.

Ongoing technical leadership without a full-time hire. I work alongside your team — reviewing architecture, weighing in on hard decisions, mentoring engineers, and helping you adopt AI tooling that actually works.

Good for early-stage founders who need a technical sounding board, and for established teams onboarding to the AI-augmented stack who want someone who’s actually done it.

Billed monthly in advance, three-month minimum, cancel with 30 days’ notice. All remote, over Zoom and email — scaling from light advisory involvement up to several days a week of hands-on work.

A defined deliverable with a defined timeline — bigger than a short-term project, narrower than a full build.

When you need a real, documented answer: is this architecture sound? Is this AI integration ready? Is this AI-generated code safe to ship? Is the team’s process working? I go deep on one question and come back with something you can act on.

Every review ships a written report and a working session with the team — done remotely over Zoom and email — so the findings land with the people who have to act on them, not just in a PDF nobody opens.

Live sessions on AI-assisted development, agent design, prompt engineering for engineers, and moving a team from “manual everything” to AI-augmented workflows.

These aren’t generic slide decks. Every session is built around your actual codebase and workflows so people leave able to do the thing — not just having watched someone talk about it.

Fixed-price by session or program — a focused half-day workshop, a full-day deep dive, or a multi-session program. Everything is delivered live and remote over Zoom; I don’t do on-site work.